That's a very interesting topic for me as well.

I have 3 Deco m9-plus 1.4 and the 3rd one, the farthest, is connected to the main with a very poor signal, while the 2nd one is in the middle between the main and the 3rd.

When I purchased this solution, I was thinking that the mesh system was clever enough to link the closest and, by the way, my 2nd Deco in the row has very good signal.

@Kevin_Z, do you think there is hope the engineering could consider that as a possible new feature?

This would make perfect my current scenario.

Thanks a lot

@Massi

Massimo_Italy wrote

 

That's a very interesting topic for me as well.

 

I have 3 Deco m9-plus 1.4 and the 3rd one, the farthest, is connected to the main with a very poor signal, while the 2nd one is in the middle between the main and the 3rd.

 

When I purchased this solution, I was thinking that the mesh system was clever enough to link the closest and, by the way, my 2nd Deco in the row has very good signal.

 

@Kevin_Z, do you think there is hope the engineering could consider that as a possible new feature?

 

This would make perfect my current scenario.

 

Thanks a lot

 

mo_Italy  please let me know if you figured this out as I have the same issue and am using 6 M9 plus and seem as all wants to connect to the main DECO.  I tried to reboot and it does work sometime but it is random

@NickatNite I am sorry Nick, I didn't. And you are right, it is random. I tried applying the recommendation to ping continuously the farthest device (the main one) during the reboot of the slave, but it worked one time only, and now the situation is back. Annoying, indeed,