TL-WA901ND v3 WiFi Max Tx Rate not correct
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
TL-WA901ND v3 WiFi Max Tx Rate not correct
Region : UnitedKingdom
Model : TL-WA901ND
Hardware Version : V3
Firmware Version : 3.16.9 Build 141030 Rel.47420n
ISP : n/a
This morning I upgraded my TL-WA901ND v3 access point to the newest firmware. After doing so, the WiFi Max Tx Rate has reduced.
I have configured the access point with a 20MHz channel width and with Short GI enabled. Before the firmware upgrade, this resulted in a correct Max Tx Rate of 144Mbps. After the upgrade, it has dropped to 130Mbps, which corresponds to a Long Guard Interval.
I have tried toggling the "Enable Short GI" checkbox on and off, but the Max Tx Rate remains unchanged at 130Mbps.
The router settings are currently:
Status page
Wireless subsection
The "Enable Short GI" checkbox is ticked on the Wireless Advanced page.
Any one have any idea what's wrong?
Could this be a regression in the latest firmware?
Thanks.
JM
Model : TL-WA901ND
Hardware Version : V3
Firmware Version : 3.16.9 Build 141030 Rel.47420n
ISP : n/a
This morning I upgraded my TL-WA901ND v3 access point to the newest firmware. After doing so, the WiFi Max Tx Rate has reduced.
I have configured the access point with a 20MHz channel width and with Short GI enabled. Before the firmware upgrade, this resulted in a correct Max Tx Rate of 144Mbps. After the upgrade, it has dropped to 130Mbps, which corresponds to a Long Guard Interval.
I have tried toggling the "Enable Short GI" checkbox on and off, but the Max Tx Rate remains unchanged at 130Mbps.
The router settings are currently:
Status page
Wireless subsection
| Operation Mode: | Access Point |
| Wireless Network Name: | [redacted] |
| Channel: | 6 |
| Mode: | 11n only |
| Channel Width: | 20MHz |
| Max Tx Rate: | 130Mbps |
| MAC Address: | 14-CC-20-[redacted] |
The "Enable Short GI" checkbox is ticked on the Wireless Advanced page.
Any one have any idea what's wrong?
Could this be a regression in the latest firmware?
Thanks.
JM
