NAT Forwarding

NAT Forwarding

NAT Forwarding
NAT Forwarding
2024-06-25 00:32:07 - last edited 2024-10-25 12:51:27
Model: XX230v  
Hardware Version: V1
Firmware Version: Firmware Version:0.12.0 3.0.0 v6066.0 Build 240319 Rel.37770n

Hey guys!
I'm having problems trying to access a server via ftp.
 

I registered a notebook that I have using port 192.168.1.7.
I also registered this fixed IP for the notebook so that it doesn't change if I restart the router or something like that. It worked, but even if I changed networks to another router that is connected to the xx230v's LAN port, I couldn't access this server, which in this case is an Archer C60.
I also did the same NAT Forwarding > Virtual Servers process.
But that's not the point, I would like to access it by accessing the xx230v, but I would like to know how to give autonomy to my Archer C60 too, since I can't add its IP to NAT Forwarding
 

Now I'm trying to register my desktop to access this server via ftp on ip 192.168.1.10 and the message appears that this port is busy.

And even if I change the already registered port to 192.168.1.10 (desktop IP) I still cannot access the ftp server.
 

What should I do?


 

  0      
  0      
#1
Options
1 Accepted Solution
Re:NAT Forwarding-Solution
2024-07-01 00:54:35 - last edited 2024-10-24 08:38:28

  @dmaber 
 

This xx230v still has many compatibility issues, regardless of whether you open the doors or not, sometimes it accepts them, sometimes it doesn't. If it disconnects from the network and reconnects, it ends up blocking the doors again, not accepting NAT forwarding.
 
And mind you, on this equipment, the automatic FTP release options were marked, I just created a rule to try to work around the problem but apparently no option works and FTP remains blocked sometimes, sometimes not.
 
I ended up opting to return this equipment and purchased an Archer ax12, which not only has a better and less confusing interface but also I no longer have problems accessing my FTP server...
 
TP-Link engineers, please check the firmware of the xx230v because it has a lot of potential but has many bugs!
Recommended Solution
  0  
  0  
#4
Options
3 Reply
Re:NAT Forwarding
2024-06-25 02:06:47 - last edited 2024-10-24 08:38:28

  @PLoOc 

 

The error message comes up because you can't open a particular port to two different IP addresses (192.168.1.7 and 192.168.1.10). It should be one or the other.

If you want to have access to your FTP server even if the FTP server is connected to Archer C60 you should configure Archer C60 in AP mode (Case 1).

Once in AP mode the Archer C60 would be in the same local network subnet as your main router and there would be no need for additional  port-forward except on the main router.

If this was helpful click on the arrow pointing upward to make it blue. If this solves your issue, click the star to make it blue and mark the post as a "Recommended Solution".
  1  
  1  
#2
Options
Re:NAT Forwarding
2024-06-25 09:42:20 - last edited 2024-10-24 08:38:28

  @PLoOc Hi man. I have XX230v as main router connected to my ISP and I have some problem with FTP, can you test my problem with xx230v ? https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/forum/topic/671356 Thanks.

  1  
  1  
#3
Options
Re:NAT Forwarding-Solution
2024-07-01 00:54:35 - last edited 2024-10-24 08:38:28

  @dmaber 
 

This xx230v still has many compatibility issues, regardless of whether you open the doors or not, sometimes it accepts them, sometimes it doesn't. If it disconnects from the network and reconnects, it ends up blocking the doors again, not accepting NAT forwarding.
 
And mind you, on this equipment, the automatic FTP release options were marked, I just created a rule to try to work around the problem but apparently no option works and FTP remains blocked sometimes, sometimes not.
 
I ended up opting to return this equipment and purchased an Archer ax12, which not only has a better and less confusing interface but also I no longer have problems accessing my FTP server...
 
TP-Link engineers, please check the firmware of the xx230v because it has a lot of potential but has many bugs!
Recommended Solution
  0  
  0  
#4
Options