Deco X20-4G / X50-4G 5GHz - which 5GHz bands/channels are supported
For many of your products I am unable to find any information on 5 GHz channels that can be used.
This are my pre-purchase questions:
1. Which 5 GHz channels are supported by the X20-4G (EU market)? Please provide either channel number ranges or frequency range.
Is it the same for X50-4G?
Motivation: In the X50-4G datasheet there is a footnote stating that 160 MHz band support is region dependent, while there is no such footnote in the X20-4G. From this I suspect that the while the X50-4G to be able to support at least one 160 MHz band is highly likely to support at least (5,17 GHz - 5,35 GHz).
As there is no such footnote in the X20-4G datasheet I suspect that the X20-4G might be limited to (5,17 GHz - 5,25 GHz) only.
The ability to use channels above the channel 48 is a huge technical difference for more congested housing areas (blocks of flats). I really do not understand why such information is not provided for the Deco products.
2. Are there any significant hidden differences between the X20-4G and the X50-4G? I am aware of the fact that X50-4G has a faster CPU and higher consumption as I tried to compare the datasheets. However, some additional significant differences might be hidden - e.g. there is no information on MCS rates, radio sensitivities, ... in teh Deco datasheets.
Motivation: These days a lot of important technical information is being deleted by the marketing people not to confuse customers, while such information would be very useful for advanced users.
(The compare tool shows the ability for LTE carrier aggregation for the X20-4G and for the X50-4G the carrier aggregation is empty.)
3. The future Deco products (e.g. Deco supporting WiFi 7 like the Deco BE65) indicate support for "TP-Link Mesh Technology" rather than mentioning the "DecoMesh. Do you foresee any compatibility issues between Deco X20/X50 and e.g. Deco BE65 (WiFi 7 Deco product) as for the ability to join the WiFI6 DecoMesh?
Motivation: I have learned that DecoMesh, EasyMesh and OneMesh are three totaly incompatible solutions and now I see "TP-Link Mesh Technology" in the description of BE65 rather than DecoMesh. This indicates that there might be a fourth mesh solution in the development. Are there any plans to improve the interoperability between various TP-link mesh solutions? Will the TPLink mesh technologies converge at least a little bit?
Thank You in advance,
Petr