Archer C6 V2.0 Loopback
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
Hello,
I've read a few forum posts asking about Archer C6 Loopback support.
I understand the feature is currently problematic in the latest stable 1.3.6 firmware.
I'm trying to run a few local apps on my home server, but I'm seeing difficulty opening the app's webui's when using a reverse proxy with an SSL certificate.
Is there a beta firmware version that solves the this issue?
Thank you.
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
Check this post and the following one. The beta FW from the latter post is the latest FW release for C6 v2 issued.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you, @terziyski .
I tried disabling/enabling NAT boost, but that didn't help.
From the two posts I also understand that for the time being the beta version does not solve this issue.
I wonder if installing OpenWRT on the router might solve this issue?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Try the beta FW from Kevin's post - https://static.tp-link.com/2020/202010/20201030/ArcherC6v2_eu-up-ver1-3-6-P1%5B20201030-rel60104%5D.zip
Many people have reported wireless issues with 5GHz band under OpenWRT, but you could try it by yourself if you decide.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
terziyski wrote
Try the beta FW from Kevin's post - https://static.tp-link.com/2020/202010/20201030/ArcherC6v2_eu-up-ver1-3-6-P1%5B20201030-rel60104%5D.zip
Many people have reported wireless issues with 5GHz band under OpenWRT, but you could try it by yourself if you decide.
Thanks.
Do you know if there are any known bugs with this beta firmware?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
I wouldn't know that, but most people report it more stable than the 1.3.6 official. Besides it has an OneMesh ON/OFF switch button.
You can give it a try and later revert back to the 1.3.6 official if you didn't like it.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 752
Replies: 5
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.