Omada EAP655-Wall slowly speed, why?
Omada EAP655-Wall slowly speed, why?
I have EAP655-Wall in my home network. One in each of the 3 rooms.
I was a bit surprised that the download and upload speeds are so poor.
I have a laptop with an Intel AX210 160MHz card and on the ASUS ZenWiFi XD6 router I had about 600 Mbps download and 200 Mbps upload.
On the EAP655-Wall I have about 300 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload in the same room as the device. I have the device set to 160 MHz for the 5 GHz network. My card supports it too.
Do you have any idea with the settings to make this download also in the ASUS area?
Should Full-Sector DFS options be enabled or disabled?
Is enabling AI Roaming for roaming a good option or leave only Fast Roaming enabled?
Is AI WLAN Optimization worth using? In the 5 GHz option, I only see optimizations to the 80 MHz frequency for the band, after optimization, it switches my 5 GHz network to the 80 MHz band with 160 MHz. Is it possible to somehow set it to leave the 160 MHz band after network optimization?
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Now I checked the transfer on another laptop with an AX210 card, that one had an AX201. On a laptop with an AX210 transfer wireless card, I have about 600 Mbps, so maybe it was the card's fault there?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
AP
Just for confirmation:
I have three EAP-655 Wall access points available at home. One in each room. Will they be the optimal settings?
1. Separation of 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz networks,
2. Bandwidth setting for 2.4GHz 40MHz, for 5GHz 160MHz,
3. Setting channel selection to Auto,
4. Setting the transmit power to high,
5. Enabling Fast Roaming, AI Roaming, DFS Full Sector, OFDMA and setting RSSI to -65 for each room, won't you set this RSSI and it will switch by itself?
Should I change or add something in these settings?
Can I have this firmware version 1.0 sent by e-mail? Latest stable version because I would like to re-upload it?
If so, I can send you an e-mail in a private message.
Alternatively, if you could provide a link where I can download this firmware?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @Intense
Intense wrote
AP
Just for confirmation:
I have three EAP-655 Wall access points available at home. One in each room. Will they be the optimal settings?
1. Separation of 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz networks,
2. Bandwidth setting for 2.4GHz 40MHz, for 5GHz 160MHz,
3. Setting channel selection to Auto,
4. Setting the transmit power to high,
5. Enabling Fast Roaming, AI Roaming, DFS Full Sector, OFDMA and setting RSSI to -65 for each room, won't you set this RSSI and it will switch by itself?
Should I change or add something in these settings?
Can I have this firmware version 1.0 sent by e-mail? Latest stable version because I would like to re-upload it?
If so, I can send you an e-mail in a private message.
Alternatively, if you could provide a link where I can download this firmware?
First, I don't take private email queries. Everything goes on the record. If you need to contact us, either email our support email and someone will assign it to an agent. Or post there.
As for the firmware, it's in pending status and I am not able to offer it to you unless it's available on the official website. The download link seems to be pending as well. I cannot leak anything if it is not published by the web team.
Like I said earlier, I have reported it to the web team about this.
Like you said, this can also be a card issue. If you don't have issues on other phone or laptops, then it's the card issue. A generic suggestion would be to upgrade your NIC driver to the latest. If the issue persists on this device alone, you probably contact Intel for help. What I can do is rule out the chance that EAP has a problem. But now it seems normal.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks but Please answer this question :)
Just for confirmation:
I have three EAP-655 Wall access points available at home. One in each room. Will they be the optimal settings?
1. Separation of 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz networks,
2. Bandwidth setting for 2.4GHz 40MHz, for 5GHz 160MHz,
3. Setting channel selection to Auto,
4. Setting the transmit power to high,
5. Enabling Fast Roaming, AI Roaming, DFS Full Sector, OFDMA and setting RSSI to -65 for each room, won't you set this RSSI and it will switch by itself?
Should I change or add something in these settings?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @Intense
Thanks for posting in our business forum.
Intense wrote
Thanks but Please answer this question :)Just for confirmation:
I have three EAP-655 Wall access points available at home. One in each room. Will they be the optimal settings?
1. Separation of 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz networks,
2. Bandwidth setting for 2.4GHz 40MHz, for 5GHz 160MHz,
3. Setting channel selection to Auto,
4. Setting the transmit power to high,
5. Enabling Fast Roaming, AI Roaming, DFS Full Sector, OFDMA and setting RSSI to -65 for each room, won't you set this RSSI and it will switch by itself?
Should I change or add something in these settings?
Would be optimal from what I can tell.
2.4GHz should be used for devices that don't support 5GHz. I personally use 2.4GHz only for my IoT. For most phones and laptops, I'll simply connect to 5GHz. Never consider 2.4GHz if I can get an ideal signal from 5GHz.
For the last RSSI, it is not auto or dynamically adapted. So, you gotta set it manually to a value. -65 would be ideal. With this RSSI threshold, once your device reaches this level and it'll roam to another one, a smoother transition between WIFI.
You don't have to set other stuff.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
WHETHER A BETTER RANGE SOLUTION WILL BE OMADA EAP-655 WALL AT HOME IN EVERY ROOM OR DECO X50-POE IN EVERY ROOM?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @Intense
Thanks for posting in our business forum.
That's up to you. Deco is a mesh system. Speed from Deco would be fluctuating due to the mesh. It provides the same seamless roaming and decent speed. No multi-SSID. Not Omada integrated.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
ok, but when it comes to range, Deco will have better because it has omnidirectional antennas and is designed for wider signal coverage than EAP-655 only for a given room?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @Intense
You could say that. As for the EAP, it is placed half inside the wall. Usually, There is definitely some signal diminishment.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 1922
Replies: 20
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.