Etherhet Backhaul oddities

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.

Etherhet Backhaul oddities

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
Etherhet Backhaul oddities
Etherhet Backhaul oddities
2024-03-28 17:33:03
Model: Deco M9 Plus   Deco M5  
Hardware Version: V3
Firmware Version:

Hello again.  

 

Just wanted to report some odd backhaul issues I've noticed in 2 instances.  I'll do them as separate posts to avoid confusion.

 

I'm calling all the Deco access points "Pod" just to make it simple.  First instance is a 3 building layout where 2 buildings have CAT-6 cables interconnecting them, but the third building cannot currently be wired.  The distances in the image are not to scale.  The conceptual idea was that "Pod 1" and Pod 3" would be the only connection over wi-fi backhaul as they are about 90 feet apart, but that didn't turn out to be the case.  What happens is that Pod 4 ignores the wired connection to Pod 3 and also connects wirelessly to either Pod 1 or Pod 2 even though it is about 350 feet away.  That connection is very weak and unstable, yet it will not use the wired connection.  

 

Questions:

1> Why won't Pod 4 use the Ethernet backhaul provided through Pod 3 which has a much stronger signal?  It would rather not connect at all than to use the wired connection.

2> Are there any plans for the app to force an access point to use a certain backhaul (including Ethernet,) similar to how you can tell devices to favor certain access points?  That way I could tell Pod 4 to use the Ethernet connection.

 

 

 

  7170dea905e44241bcda632f08527d06

  0      
  0      
#1
Options
2 Reply
Re:Etherhet Backhaul oddities
2024-03-28 17:51:18

The second even more odd scenario is when I attempt to use an X75 Pro as an Ethernet Backhaul relay.  Theoretically I should have no wi-fi backhaul. Yet in the following illustration, Pod 4 or Pod 5 will connect as wireless to one of the "House" pods if I attempt to plug the backhaul from the house switch into Pod 4, and then the Pod 5 into Pod 4.  It isn't consistent which one gets the wi-fi backhaul, but at least 1 of them will ignore the Ethernet backhaul.  They will not both connect to Ethernet at the same time.  BUT, if I put a small gigabit network switch where the underground cable comes into the Garage/Workshop and then put Pod 4 and Pod 5 into that small switch using the exact same CAT-6 cables, everything works as intended and I have nothing using wi-fi backhaul.  I would rather not waste the use of a network switch, given this scenario is one of the documented ways of connecting the Deco units.

 

Questions:

1> Why won't Pod 5 connect via Ethernet backhaul through Pod 4?

2> Why does a small network switch make everything use the wired backhaul?

 

 

 

0b02d45ee41e45e4a66b748868105ffc

  0  
  0  
#2
Options
Re:Etherhet Backhaul oddities
2024-03-31 15:40:35

  @11thPlague 

I have a similar setup. My metal building shop deco is wireless, but have a closer satellite deco within the house that can provide better signal strength to serve the shop. I hoped I could daisy-chain the satellite decos to provide better internet coverage within my metal building. But the shop deco always wants to connect to the main deco providing a weaker signal.

  0  
  0  
#3
Options

Information

Helpful: 0

Views: 288

Replies: 2

Related Articles