Wlan Mesh problems
Hello,
a few days ago I replaced my Fritz!Box Mesh with a tp-linkOmada Mesh system. Since then I have had problems with many end devices.
I have a SG2008P switch. An EAP650 (Name: Mesh top) is connected to it via LAN cable at the switch. And then further down the chain there is another EAP650 (Name: Mesh middle) and another EAP650 (Name: Mesh below)
SG2008P -> Mesh top -> Mesh middle -> Mesh below
The devices are not so far apart but one for each floor
I am constantly losing the connection to devices on "Mesh middle" and "Mesh below".
These devices can no longer access the Internet but I can see the device connected under "client".
I cannot ping the devices from my PC wich is connected to the switch by cable. If I connect my MacBook to the "Mesh top", I can't access the devices either. If I connect my MacBook to the "Mesh below", I can reach the devices
Most of the problems I have are with Shelly Automation Devices (https:// www. shelly. com /), but that was exactly the reason for buying a new stable mesh solution. I never had such problems with the Fritz!Box Mesh. That's why I rule out a problem with the Shelly devices.
From Omada as source “Mesh below” it works
Endgerätausgabe:
D8-44-89-E9-A4-0E
PING 192.168.0.116, (192.168.0.116) 32 data bytes.
Reply from 192.168.0.116: bytes=32 ttl=128 icmp_seq=0 time=8.477ms
Reply from 192.168.0.116: bytes=32 ttl=128 icmp_seq=1 time=82.746ms
Reply from 192.168.0.116: bytes=32 ttl=128 icmp_seq=2 time=4.275ms
Reply from 192.168.0.116: bytes=32 ttl=128 icmp_seq=3 time=3.971ms
--- ping Statistic 192.168.0.116 ---
Packets: Sent=4, Received=4, Lost=0 (0.0% loss)
Round-trip min/avg/max = 3.971/24.867/82.746 ms
From my Computer connect via LAN on SG2008P
C:\>ping 192.168.0.116
Ping wird ausgeführt für 192.168.0.116 mit 32 Bytes Daten:
Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
Ping-Statistik für 192.168.0.116:
Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 0, Verloren = 4
(100% Verlust),
What is the possibility of finding the problem?
Thx, Neki