CLIENTS REDIRECTING BANDWIDTH

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
12

CLIENTS REDIRECTING BANDWIDTH

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
15 Reply
Re:CLIENTS REDIRECTING BANDWIDTH
2022-07-09 23:29:41

  @btx 

 

I 100% agree with you.  I myself have used Tik for a long time as well as Cisco.  

 

For the price point, Omada is a good fit.  If you want more features, Tik is the way to go.  I was saying good luck with the gui because its in left field compared to Omada/UBNT.  It's def a learning curve.  I feel like RouterOS is really close to EdgeOS and or JuniperOS.  If they're comfortable with those CLI's, then go for Tik.  

 

I think the features this user is wanting, Omada cant provide right out of the box.  

 

 

I can not teach anyone anything - I can only make them think - Socrates
  0  
  0  
#12
Options
Re:CLIENTS REDIRECTING BANDWIDTH
2022-07-10 16:18:52

  @btx exactly, i charge clients for internet access.... well i understand mikrotik is my only option.... its really not what i wanted but i definitely do not have choice... thanks for your help.

  0  
  0  
#13
Options
Re:CLIENTS REDIRECTING BANDWIDTH
2022-07-10 23:13:14 - last edited 2022-07-10 23:27:44

  @Saamoss 

 

The guest network option is supposed to block all clients from seeing each other as well as all the other local networks/clients.

 

Could the reason for this not working be that your using a non Omada compatible switch between the AP's and the router?

  0  
  0  
#14
Options
Re:CLIENTS REDIRECTING BANDWIDTH
2022-07-20 10:59:31

  @Tescophil 

no i dont think so... it just doesn't work that way anymore.... i got tplin switch tl_sg2008P and it was still the same thing.... 

  0  
  0  
#15
Options
Re:CLIENTS REDIRECTING BANDWIDTH
2022-07-20 12:36:07 - last edited 2022-10-13 11:06:09

EDIT

  0  
  0  
#16
Options