Hi all,

Over the years the HOME network turned in to the SOHO, the differentr switched were introduced no end game planned just reactive purchased. then i had enought of  the choas

I woke up and realised "why the hell do i have 80 Devices all on this one router talking to each other? using the 1 wifi SSID"

I have 80 IOTS, smart TV,s 2 laptops one work one personal, Foxte BOX, NAS, DESKTOP, laser printers, 8 cctv cameras outside, mobile phones, relays, meters, automated devices, etc etc all talking to each or albeit trying to and a HELIUM minor on a 15m antenna on the roof just waiting top be hacked throgh port 80, no guest network 80 lots plus

AND its all on the HUwaeii B818-236 LTE 4g Router!

Its open house lol

And the minor needs super ptioroty speed to getthe miningh rewards im 250ms late for rewards when more tha 10 chllangers for the coin, used to make 500 a day in tokens 2 years later competition alllaround, im down to 50, I need the Miner to have priortity secure priotoy to trhe net so im miun yes -240ms to reard when again 120 to 200 otherr hotspots, so i need speed to make the outlay for the minor pay itself off, I know its possible the hotspot next t me all making 1500 a day, dame one has 6 miners all making 1500 a day,l traffic passing mny internal network to slow to the chase.

So all NETGEAR hardware switches out!,

ASll new TP-Link Hardware IN

With 2x EAP650's, ER605, SG2008, 2x ES205G's about to go online to replace the HUWAEII as it will be in BRIDGE MODE, not gone completely

All this and i live alone ....*shakes head*

Deciding on if better for future expansion as i will be house with parthner and the kids one day.....atm im trying to decide for the last component

THE hardware controller, all in one place will be heaven!

SO question for all

the TPlink OC200 or the OC300 HW controller for my solo, SOHO network ??

Now i know its ridiculous overkill for me to have the OC300 when you consider devices it can handle, so is the OC200 really

HOWEVER i like the fact OC300 without a doubt will never ever strain with too many devices for the rest of my days on this earth. 

AND i heard the OC200 had issues with vllan ID being configured to it , something about casn only give it 1Vlan ID not 2 (dont know all the details)

And the OC200  has 2 × 10/100Mbps Ethernet Ports and yes its not relevant because its not moving traffic through it...so why then even have the

the OC300  2× 000 Mbps Ethernet Ports?? if it makes no difference! why not havbe them as 100Mbps??

IT MUST in some way be better?

Its HUGE and rackmnout but my network is fror a home complex, and ineed vlans segratation, and speed for HELIUM miner prioroty data.\

I think foir the exctra $100AU, the OC300 why the hell not?!

Thoughts?>

Compelling points of view?>

Kind Regards

NL