I received my first OC400 controller today. I see that the LAN interface ports (both SFP+ and the RJ45) behave in the same way as the OC300s I have, i.e. as a simple unmanaged switch.

I asked a query for my OC300 controller here about LAG trunking for it's switch ports, and would like to extend this request to add LAG trunking for the OC400 controller as well.

I note that there are others who have requested more functionality for the hardware controller LAN interface ports, such as here and here .

Given that the application for Omada is for a fully-managed business network, it is strange that that hardware controller switch itself is completely unmanaged for both the OC300 and OC400. Could you please pass this request to your developers?

Thank you for your help.