One DSL to two remote stations using 3 CPEs in total
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
One DSL to two remote stations using 3 CPEs in total
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
One DSL to two remote stations using 3 CPEs in total
Posts: 183
Helpful: 12
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2018-09-03
2016-11-12 17:20:44
Posts: 183
Helpful: 12
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2018-09-03
One DSL to two remote stations using 3 CPEs in total
2016-11-12 17:20:44
Tags:
Model :
Hardware Version :
Firmware Version :
ISP :
As per the title...in the process of setting up a wireless network that consists of a DSL base with a CPE510 setup as AP, Station A. with a CPE510 (first client / transponder) with LoS to the DSL base over a distance of 1km and a link of 300Mbps which runs a TD-W9980 and Station B. (second client) which links to Station A. over a distance of 4km with a solid 50Mbps link via another CPE510 connected to a TD-W8980.
Between the DSL base and Station B. there is no LoS, so no link can be achieved, hence this topology was forced in effect.
The question is what setup to choose for Station A. CPE's to manage it's devices through the TD-W9980 DHCP's server independently off the DSL base, namely have it's own private pool of IP addresses and DHCP server which insures that if/when power is cut at the DSL base the devices connected to Station A's TD-W9980 can still 'talk' to one another and the link between Station A. and B. remains active for 'intranet' traffic. Bare in mind that Station A. needs to act as a transponder to Station B., too so in actual fact three independent networks need to be created that actually share one DSL connection to the internet via the DSL base...
Any help appreciated. :)
Hardware Version :
Firmware Version :
ISP :
As per the title...in the process of setting up a wireless network that consists of a DSL base with a CPE510 setup as AP, Station A. with a CPE510 (first client / transponder) with LoS to the DSL base over a distance of 1km and a link of 300Mbps which runs a TD-W9980 and Station B. (second client) which links to Station A. over a distance of 4km with a solid 50Mbps link via another CPE510 connected to a TD-W8980.
Between the DSL base and Station B. there is no LoS, so no link can be achieved, hence this topology was forced in effect.
The question is what setup to choose for Station A. CPE's to manage it's devices through the TD-W9980 DHCP's server independently off the DSL base, namely have it's own private pool of IP addresses and DHCP server which insures that if/when power is cut at the DSL base the devices connected to Station A's TD-W9980 can still 'talk' to one another and the link between Station A. and B. remains active for 'intranet' traffic. Bare in mind that Station A. needs to act as a transponder to Station B., too so in actual fact three independent networks need to be created that actually share one DSL connection to the internet via the DSL base...
Any help appreciated. :)
Now serving finite customer via f(x)=AirTime/∞ on the 5Ghz band :-/
#1
Options
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
11 Reply
Posts: 136
Helpful: 3
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2016-01-21
Re:One DSL to two remote stations using 3 CPEs in total
2016-11-16 06:38:32
RTouris wrote
In terms of using Station A's CPE510 as a repeater how much of a throughput penalty would expect that to incur?
theoretical speed for the CPE510 is 300 Mbps maximum via wireless if used with 40 MHz channel width for the distance is better use 20 MHz channel width but no work to 300Mbps only 150 Mbps.
Another limitation you will find will be the LAN port, this works only at 100Mbps so the speed will no longer be 150Mbps if not 100Mbps ..
Now can not coexist at the same instant of time a chain Tx and a chain Rx which will theoretically reduce in half, which would be 75Mbps in the wireless, but in practice is less than that, considering the factors of the environment (noise, LoS , Fresnel distance) and the equipment (working mode, power safety), you could go down to less than 30Mbps ...
you should try ...
Regards...
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
0
We appreciate your feedback. Feel free to let us know more. Log in to submit feedback.
#12
Options
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thread Manage
Announcement Manage
Posts: 183
Helpful: 12
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2018-09-03
2016-11-12 17:20:44
Posts: 183
Helpful: 12
Solutions: 0
Stories: 0
Registered: 2018-09-03
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 2117
Replies: 11
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.
Tags
Related Articles
Two WANs, one LAN
1337
0
Report Inappropriate Content
Transfer Module
New message