R1D2 wrote

This is nonsense. I use PharOS V2 on my V1 hardware. V2 is just a visual identity upgrade, meaning it changed only look & feel and the TP-Link logo by reason of the company's 20-year anniversary. I also use such visual identity upgrades on other TP-Link gear such as the Easy Smart Switches, which also can be upgraded despite their hardware version.

See http://forum.tp-link.com/showthread.php?94812-Upgrading-all-my-Pharos-v1.x-network-to-2.0



I did write this already. Nevertheless I am testing all kinds of setups and so I did test TDMA of several CPE210s in a PtMP setup even with an additional TL-WA7210 using beta firmware, which enables TDMA for this device, too. But since I use only PtP in day-to-day use for a permanent directional radio link at the moment, I disabled it after testing and seeing that it perfectly works. I'm testing all and everything of functionality of the devices I can get hands on. It is my business as a consultant to get practical experience with the gear I'm selling, so I can advise customers without having to guess or think or believe etc.



I'm out of this discussion now.

You're using TEST mode with non-WiFi frequencies, so every problem appearing in this mode, which - as the names says - is for testing, but not for regular use, is just a useless waste of time and will not lead to any solution.

@Boris01 

It's been sad three years since I did this planting and nothing happened. The problems of random disconnection of clients still persist, in the case of having a cpe 210 or cpe 220 as access points. I wrote an email with this support to Tplink technical support and the most logical answer I got was that "these teams work better than in pairs." In other words, the PMP concept does not exist and MAXTREAM does not exist as a TDMA system. What was my solution? Then put as an accesspoint (AP) a ROCKET M2 from Ubiquiti, configured without AIRMAX and holy remedy, there were no more disconnections. It is a pity that this product has drifted.