Switch getting in status 'Disconnected' in Omada
Hi All, I followed instructions from below link:
https://www.tp-link.com/pl/support/faq/4017/
Basically I wanted to achieve very same network schema, the only difference is that my Internet Gateway is non-Omada TP-Link routetr MR200.
So basically everything worked well, until I put into VLAN3 port on which I have my Controler OC200 and few EAP connected. Worth mentioning that OC200 and those EAP were working just fine (via Omada) before I added TL-SG3428X.
So once OC200 got into VLAN3, I can't control switch TL-SG3428X as Omada don't recognize it. Not sure what else I can do with it.
Maybe I missed something, like OC200 should be somewhere else than VLA3 in topology from article? Maybe EAP also?
Any ideas on how I can setup MR200 as simply modem to Internet -> TL-SG3428X as main switch managing my home network -> OC200 Controler -> EAP's -> multiple LAN and WLAN clients.
Thanks in advance!
Marek
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for posting in our business forum.
1. MR is not an Omada router. I assume that's the home router?
They don't support Multi-nets NAT. And it would waste your time doing this setup. You won't be able to get Internet in the end.
2. You should not change the default IP address of VLAN 1. If VLAN 1 has been changed, you will lose the connection to the controller. And it enters the heartbeat missed and disconnected status eventually.
Details are explained:
How to Set Up VLAN Interface on the Omada Router
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @Clive_A , thanks for your answer.
MR200 is a TP-Link router with GSM modem, in my scenario I use it to simply deliver Internet, nothing more. I want my switch TL-SG3428X to handle whole network traffic.
So I believe that scenario that is described in article that I linked perfectly fits my requirements, whereas MR200 do simply static routing to TL-SG3428X and vice-versa.
And the thing is that it actually works! I mean, I have internet via my wireless and cable (both are withing VLAN3 from mentioned scenario). Omada controler and EAP's are also on VLAN3 and I can access them all. The only thing that is missing is that TL-SG3428X gets in status 'Disconnected' when I move Controler OR200 from 'Default' port to 'VLAN3', somehow Controler can't reach TL-SG3428X?? So with this setup I can't no longer manage TL-SG3428X as it can't be reached by OR200 (and I can't manage it via web interface as it's already linked to Omada).
Maybe there is simple alternative here, like put only Controler OC200 on 'Default' port, but woulr EAP's be able to reach OC200?
Maybe other question, my main intention is to totally separate MR200, meaning treat it only as Internet provider, no DHCP, nothing, all trafic should go to my network managed fully by Omada. Maybe there is some other configuration method? At this moment I don't see bigger added value by buing extra router from Omada that will be acting as gateway.
I read article that you shared, there are multiple scenarios described there, even one of them is linking to article that I was using.
Thanks!
Marek
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for posting in our business forum.
MarekZegarek wrote
Hi @Clive_A , thanks for your answer.
MR200 is a TP-Link router with GSM modem, in my scenario I use it to simply deliver Internet, nothing more. I want my switch TL-SG3428X to handle whole network traffic.
So I believe that scenario that is described in article that I linked perfectly fits my requirements, whereas MR200 do simply static routing to TL-SG3428X and vice-versa.
And the thing is that it actually works! I mean, I have internet via my wireless and cable (both are withing VLAN3 from mentioned scenario). Omada controler and EAP's are also on VLAN3 and I can access them all. The only thing that is missing is that TL-SG3428X gets in status 'Disconnected' when I move Controler OR200 from 'Default' port to 'VLAN3', somehow Controler can't reach TL-SG3428X?? So with this setup I can't no longer manage TL-SG3428X as it can't be reached by OR200 (and I can't manage it via web interface as it's already linked to Omada).
Maybe there is simple alternative here, like put only Controler OC200 on 'Default' port, but woulr EAP's be able to reach OC200?
Maybe other question, my main intention is to totally separate MR200, meaning treat it only as Internet provider, no DHCP, nothing, all trafic should go to my network managed fully by Omada. Maybe there is some other configuration method? At this moment I don't see bigger added value by buing extra router from Omada that will be acting as gateway.
I read article that you shared, there are multiple scenarios described there, even one of them is linking to article that I was using.
Thanks!
Marek
You are free to cascade, but we always recommend avoiding double-NAT.
About the OC200, this thing is working based on a simple rule that it has to follow the same subnet. Which means, same VLAN and the subnet gotta be the same because it sends the broadcast(discovery) packets to the subnet.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks @Clive_A for answer.
Well, if I understand you correctly about OR200, it's actually already within same subnet as TL-SG3428X (on VLAN3), OR200 is even taking IP from TL-SG3428X via DHCP, so why somehow can't communicate with it?
I really followed everything as per article, the only thing that is not described there is where Omada Controler is placed?
Another alternative that I see is that OR200 have extra ETH2 port, maybe I should somehow utlize it to connect with TL-SG3428X but not via VLAN3?
Thanks!
Marek
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
controller can only manage a switch on the switches management vlan.
If switch management vlan is not vlan3, it will not be able to adopt or configure it.
It doesnt matter what vlan is used for management - can be any vlan ID and any private IP range, but all the devices must have their management vlan set to the same - possibly in standalone first before adoption then ensuring that once adopted, the management vlan is re-applied in the controller per device. Otherwise it gets messy having to find and change controller IP with the discovery tool.
The easiest way i have foind if you want a different management vlan is to set everything up on default 1, then slowly working you way up the chain (device furthest away from controller in terms of how many switches it has to go through) change its management VLAN and IP range. It will then go disconnected. Do this one at a time per device all the way up the chain, leaving the controller last. Then, change the controller management vlan and IP. Everything should be found and readopted after.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
@GRL Thank for giving me ultimate hint - once I switched "Management VLAN" to my VLAN3 switch TL-SG3428X become visible in Omada Controller OR200. So now it works as I expected. I might be worth to add this part to some explanation in below article that I was referring initially:
https://www.tp-link.com/pl/support/faq/4017/
However trying to setup rest of things around my network, I realized that DHCP Address reservation does not work for VLAN3, it's possible only to assign it to 'Default' network. I'm not sure why this is a limitation as VLAN3 have it's own DHCP address assignment...
So extra question - is it possible to setup somehow Address reservation within my VLAN3 range of addresses? Maybe somehow using DHCP server on TL-SG3428X on 'Default' network and DKCP relay on VLAN3? Again, my idea is to separate my Internet provided router, everything should be managed in Omada.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Do you mean you cant reserve the switches address in the controller on vlan3 dhcp pool?
Yeah, for some reason you cant do this in the natural way for omada devices - BUT, you can manually add its MAC and the IP address you want it on to DHCP reservations just in case you ever have to factory reset the switch or whatver, it will come back up with its intended IP.
My personal preference is to set all network hardware as statics, and add them manually to DHCP reservation as well. That way you can always be sure that they get the right IP and that IP is never given to anything else.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 112
Replies: 7
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.