Early Access ER7212PC V1 1.3.0 Build 20250117 Pre-Release Firmware (Released on Jan 23rd, 2025)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6fbd/b6fbde2befdfa7062fa9672519a9cbdb9cddc9fe" alt=""
This Article Applies to
ER7212PC(UN) V1
Release Notes
Version Info:
Adapted Model: ER7212PC(UN) 1.0
Fully Adapted Controller Version: SDNC 5.14. It has adapted to ES series models.
Minimum FW Version for Update: none.
New Features:
1. Update the controller version to 5.14.34.
2. Add support for OpenAPI
3. Add support for Alias IP
4. Add support for Virtual WAN
5. Add support to disable NAT
Firmware Download
Before the Upgrade
(1) Please be sure you have read the Beta Test Agreement before upgrading the Beta firmware!
(2) You may follow the following guide to upgrade your Omada devices. How to Upgrade/Downgrade Omada Gateways
Firmware Download Link
ER7212PC(UN)_V1_1.3.0_Build20250117
Notes:
(1) The above firmware applies to the described models.
(2) Your device’s configuration won’t be lost after upgrading.
Additional Information
All feedback is welcome, including letting us know about successful device upgrades.
If somehow you encounter an issue during or after the router upgrade, it's suggested to contact us with the following info:
- Omada Controller version
- Device Firmware version with Build number (previous and current)
If your router gets bricked during the firmware upgrade, you may follow the guide below to recover the firmware.
How to use the Emergency Mode to recover the firmware for Omada Gateways
Update Log
Jan 23rd, 2024:
Release of this post.
Recommended Threads
Get the Latest Firmware Releases for Omada Routers Here - Subscribe for Updates
Get the Latest Omada SDN Controller Releases Here - Subscribe for Updates
Experience the Latest Omada EAP Firmware - Trial Available Here, Subscribe for Updates!
Current Available Solutions to Omada Router Related Issues [Actively Updated, Post for Subscription]
- Copy Link
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Report Inappropriate Content
When will OpenVPN support version 2.5 and preferably 2.6?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
On TPlink web site:
Highly Secure VPN: Supports IPsec VPN, OpenVPN, and L2TP/PPTP VPN connections.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @Jarek78
Thanks for posting in our business forum.
Jarek78 wrote
On TPlink web site:
Highly Secure VPN: Supports IPsec VPN, OpenVPN, and L2TP/PPTP VPN connections.
Does OVPN announce any previous versions are obsolete or vulnerable? If you could share any, I could use that information to push the dev to move forward. We have updated several models to a higher OVPN version. I think this is gonna move forward step by step.
IPsec has been around for decades now. Why would we still consider it a safe way to do a site-to-site?
And secure does not mean the latest. The latest does not mean stability. This is a common practice in the business environment. Nothing is safe unless you fix it with frequent maintenance.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello @Clive_A
RE:
4. Add support for Virtual WAN
Does it is mean that OpenVPN now have a virtual WAN (like PPTP/L2TP have)?
Is it now possible to use OpenVPN's WAN for Static/Policy Routing rules?
my device is 8411.. but if 7212 ready for this features probably 8411 will be next...
Regards, Thank you!
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello, I've put the 1.3.0 build 20250117 Rel.82359 firmware onto my ER7212PC.
I noticed when looking at the Clients list in my network that the units for RX Rate and TX Rate seem to be wrong (kbps instead of mbps, bps not kbps). (I cross checked this with my Windows laptop that shows "Mbps" as the units for the connection on the client side).
I'm not sure about the Download and Upload units, but they also seem low.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Another possible event log formatting issue with the 1.3.0 build 20250117 Rel.82359 firmware on my ER7212PC.
I have enabled logging for Roam events:
[My network] > Logs > Notifications > Events > Client > Client Roaming (Wireless) enabled
I see the roam events logged correctly in the Web UI, but in the Omada Android mobile app version v4.21.23 the "from" access point name is not given:
Scrolling back to before I updated the ER7212PC firmware a similar message was logged correctly
Clicking on the correctly formatted AP names navigates to the AP overview, but clicking on the incorrectly formatted name gives a pop up message "AP does not exist".
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Should the router memory usage be reported on the Usage chart (the lower chart in this screenshot)?
[My Network] > Statistics > Performance > [My Router]
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @RockPaper
Thanks for posting in our business forum.
RockPaper wrote
Another possible event log formatting issue with the 1.3.0 build 20250117 Rel.82359 firmware on my ER7212PC.
I have enabled logging for Roam events:
[My network] > Logs > Notifications > Events > Client > Client Roaming (Wireless) enabled
I see the roam events logged correctly in the Web UI, but in the Omada Android mobile app version v4.21.23 the "from" access point name is not given:
Scrolling back to before I updated the ER7212PC firmware a similar message was logged correctly
Clicking on the correctly formatted AP names navigates to the AP overview, but clicking on the incorrectly formatted name gives a pop up message "AP does not exist".
This is new firmware that has not been adapted to the app. Try to downgrade and see if you have a different result?
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @RockPaper
Thanks for posting in our business forum.
RockPaper wrote
Should the router memory usage be reported on the Usage chart (the lower chart in this screenshot)?
[My Network] > Statistics > Performance > [My Router]
Get a full-day graph while under incognito mode.
- Copy Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6fbd/b6fbde2befdfa7062fa9672519a9cbdb9cddc9fe" alt=""
Information
Helpful: 0
Views: 1841
Replies: 30
Voters 0
No one has voted for it yet.