1
Votes

VPN "lan-to-lan" vs "client-to-lan"

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
 
1
Votes

VPN "lan-to-lan" vs "client-to-lan"

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
VPN "lan-to-lan" vs "client-to-lan"
VPN "lan-to-lan" vs "client-to-lan"
2024-04-07 10:22:07 - last edited 2024-04-08 01:01:59
Model: TL-R600VPN  
Hardware Version: V4
Firmware Version:

Hello good.

 

I have always used a VPN for home use between multiple family members.

 

I bought R600vpn and since it is a professional router, I have more options than traditional routers.

 

I have a question....

 

What is the difference between configuring a VPN in "Client-to-lan" mode or configuring it in "lan-to-lan" mode?

 

As I have read, "client-to-lan" is for a person to connect to the VPN with software.

 

The "lan-to-lan" switch is a direct connection between 2 routers.

 

That means that if you configure the R600vpn as "lan-to-lan" no user will be able to connect to the vpn if they use a mobile or a computer?

#1
Options
1 Reply
Re:VPN "lan-to-lan" vs "client-to-lan"
2024-04-08 02:00:31

Hi @BDPR 

Thanks for posting in our business forum.

It does not conflict between the two types of VPN. You just need to host two different servers for different purposes.

Best Regards! If you are new to the forum, please read: Howto - A Guide to Use Forum Effectively. Read Before You Post. Look for a model? Search your model NOW Official and Beta firmware. NEW features! Subscribe for the latest update!Download Beta Here☚ ☛ ★ Configuration Guide ★ ☚ ☛ ★ Knowledge Base ★ ☚ ☛ ★ Troubleshooting ★ ☚ ● Be kind and nice. ● Stay on the topic. ● Post details. ● Search first. ● Please don't take it for granted. ● No email confidentiality should be violated. ● S/N, MAC, and your true public IP should be mosaiced.
#2
Options