Hi @s42p 

You can upvote here.

https://community.tp-link.com/en/business/forum/topic/602870

Something similar to this request.

Let me ask this first, if there is a problem with the relay server on Tailscale, most users would think this is a problem with us. Most users would lack knowledge and ability to fix problems like this and most cannot figure out subnetting. Shall we tech support them with Tailscale-related questions?

However, not having a public IP address to host a VPN server seems to be a problem that needs to be fixed first. It indeed saves your money but from my point of view, it would only increase the queries on "how to fix it" and "bug with Omada tailscale". This does not seem to benefit our reputation.

The router is set to be a router hosting a VPN server or to be a client in a business network. Charge-free. Tailscale got a free plan but if it is indeed like what you said for a business environment, they would go for the plan. This would cost extra money as well.

This might shock people who don't know Tailscale and would ask us again why it charges for advanced features. Of course, it is not a move by us but it will arise questions in the foreseeable future.

Second, like the first one I wrote, it is on the relay server. So, what is the potential legal issue in this? If there is a data leak, will it be us to take responsibility for inviting a function with a third-party relay server?

I am aware that you can host one yourself. But, of course, most people on this forum do not know what to do. And it will still cost you money to host a VPS.

What else does it do besides set up an IPsec to form a mesh?