EAP683-LR Poor network performance with tagged vlans on SSID

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.

EAP683-LR Poor network performance with tagged vlans on SSID

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
28 Reply
Re:EAP683-LR Poor network performance with tagged vlans on SSID
2023-12-26 21:49:58

Does your switch support vlans?

  0  
  0  
#12
Options
Re:EAP683-LR Poor network performance with tagged vlans on SSID
2023-12-26 22:34:17

  @muzicman0 As I said in the original post, everything was working prior to replacing ubiquiti APs with a single tp-link AP. no configuration has changed (except for testing done in this thread). The wired network accepts vlan traffic correctly. The only odd behavior is traffic tagged under a vlan configured at the AP. I just finished double-checking firewall configs and even reset everything in the tp-link config back to defaults, setup a single SSID and can replicate the issue. It really seems like tagged traffic may be bugged on the EAP683-LR.

  0  
  0  
#13
Options
Re:EAP683-LR Poor network performance with tagged vlans on SSID
2023-12-27 00:37:08

  @rumblpak I suppose that is possible.  I only use EAP245's and EAP670's.  It does seem odd that you can ping devices but can't create a TCP connection, but like you said, maybe there is a bug in that specific AP.

  0  
  0  
#14
Options
Re:EAP683-LR Poor network performance with tagged vlans on SSID
2023-12-27 03:42:49

  @rumblpak 

 

Are there any similar issues to yours in the following threads?

TCP Connections May Fail Between Different VLANs On The Same EAP

ETH VLAN Related Issues

Just striving to develop myself while helping others.
  0  
  0  
#15
Options
Re:EAP683-LR Poor network performance with tagged vlans on SSID
2023-12-27 14:54:09

  @Virgo 

 

The TCP connections article is about connections on different VLANs, in my case I am having issues connecting to services on the same VLAN.

The ETH VLAN related issues implies that a VLAN isn't tagged but I get IPs on devices in all 3 VLANs, I just have issues maintaining longer connections (like HTTP(S) traffic) to servers on the same VLAN.

 

Virgo wrote

  @rumblpak 

 

Are there any similar issues to yours in the following threads?

TCP Connections May Fail Between Different VLANs On The Same EAP

ETH VLAN Related Issues

 

  0  
  0  
#16
Options
Re:EAP683-LR Poor network performance with tagged vlans on SSID
2023-12-27 20:15:38 - last edited 2023-12-27 20:20:07

  @rumblpak are you using Windows or Linux, or a combo of both? 

 

Windows is famous for turning the firewall back on if you breath on it to heavily.

 

Linux gives us some extra troubleshooting tools.  If it's Linux, try to telnet on the port of the server.  For instance, for my Emby server, I enter telnet 10.3.0.124 8096.  Even though it is a Windows server, it responds.  If the port is blocked, or Firewall is blocking it, it will refuse the connection.

  0  
  0  
#17
Options
Re:EAP683-LR Poor network performance with tagged vlans on SSID
2023-12-27 20:17:12

  @muzicman0 

 

Windows, Linux, Mac, and a crapton of rando IoT devices.

  0  
  0  
#18
Options
Re:EAP683-LR Poor network performance with tagged vlans on SSID
2023-12-27 20:21:54

  @rumblpak sorry, I was editing my post while you responded.  Try the telnet command from above to see if the port is open. 

 

What OS is your plex server hosted on?  We should try and stick to a single problem right now.

 

Also, if you configure a switch port to be on one of the VLANs, does it work (this will help tell us if it is an actual AP problem or something else).

  1  
  1  
#19
Options
Re:EAP683-LR Poor network performance with tagged vlans on SSID
2023-12-28 14:42:25
In this case, I can't hit any local service, whether its truenas, plex, any docker container, etc. It's pretty much everything on the same VLAN.
  0  
  0  
#20
Options
Re:EAP683-LR Poor network performance with tagged vlans on SSID
2023-12-28 15:52:20

  @rumblpak In which case?

  0  
  0  
#21
Options