Wired vs Wireless Traffic graphs Discrepancy
Trying to understand the usage/traffic statistics, as it doesn't seem the various numbers add up.
All data consumption is wireless thru 7 access points (EAP225-outdoor, EAP245). There is no possibility for wired traffic to be consuming data as indicated in the Omada Report pages. Most AP's are connected through the Gateway ports (ER72061.3.0), or PoE switch (SG-2008P 3.0.4), but 4 AP's are connected through a non-Omada switch in another building (wired to one of the TP-Link switches noted herein). 2 AP's are mesh (wireless) connected. I suspect that those AP's are being counted as wired traffic? Does this mean the traffic is "double counted". once for the AP end-points, and once for the wired switch that carries that AP traffic?
Shown is the AP Summary pie chart that comes up with a totally different total over the same time period.
Traffic Summary indicates 525.7 GB (which could include the StarLink WAN port total?). This chart agree's with the Traffic Distribution total shown below.
For "Wireless Traffic", the following pie charts agree (145 GB): Traffic Distribution, SSID summary, Band Summary. But the AP Summary shows 221 GB.
For "Wired Traffic", the following counters disagree: Traffic Distribution (380 GB), Switch Summary (90 GB), total Traffic (525 GB). See... 380 + 90 =
When tallied, shouldn't all these values agree? Which value is closer to reality?