TX Frames - High, likely a problem?

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.

TX Frames - High, likely a problem?

This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
22 Reply
Re:TX Frames - High, likely a problem?
2020-01-06 03:26:06
Hello everyone!) Happy New Year!) I have long wanted to propose adding the function Basic Rates and Supported Rates. This should help optimize WiFi. this of course will not solve the design problem, but it will help a bit in optimization. As we all know, a good result consists of little things!)
  0  
  0  
#12
Options
Re:TX Frames - High, likely a problem?
2020-01-06 15:15:04

@hashrack 

 

If you are still seeing issues here, I'd recommend taking a closer look at your coverage area and the distance to your clients like @R1D2 is saying.  You are right when you say that you can't ask the clients to just move closer, but you can probably bring the WiFi closer to them.  I don't know how big your area is, but it might make sense to add another access point.  You are already running a controller, so it would be really easy to do.  You would want to make sure the 2.4GHz band is set up with 20MHz channels on non-overlapping channels (1,6,11).  You would probably just need to balance out the access points so that they are each covering about half the area.

 

APs aren't expensive, and I think if your clients are paying, you might want to get another AP to make sure they have a good experiance.

 

Good luck!

  1  
  1  
#13
Options
Re:TX Frames - High, likely a problem?
2020-01-06 15:19:39 - last edited 2020-01-06 15:22:13

 

R1D2 wrote

@hashrack, again: take a look at the SNR of clients which are at the edge of the covered area. They can cause massive re-trasmissions.

Next, change the WiFi channel (and channel bandwidth if it is not at 20 MHz already). Does changing the channel affect the utilization?

 

BTW: a new firmware for OC200 (V1.2.1, Controller V3.2.5) was just released. One of the enhancements is:

3. Optimize the UI of Channel Utilization.

 

@R1D2 

 

Sir, can you give me the exact version info for new features/fixed bug notes and also the direct download link for the latest windows version of omada controller (V3.2.5) for eap225-outdoor? it seems that is still not yet posted on the eap225-outdoor support page.

 

https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/download/eap225-outdoor/#Controller_Software

 

Thanks!

  0  
  0  
#15
Options
Re:TX Frames - High, likely a problem?
2020-01-06 15:24:14 - last edited 2020-01-06 15:28:01

Hi @Fugazi,

 

it's not yet published on all support sites, but you can download it already here:

https://static.tp-link.com/2019/201912/20191231/OC200(UN)_v1_1.2.1_Build_20191126.zip

 

This are the release notes (copied from german support site):

 

Bundle Omada Controller 3.2.5.

Bundled Firmware:

 

EAP110_V1, EAP110_V2 EAP110_V4
EAP115_V1, EAP115_V2 EAP115_V4
EAP225_V1, EAP225_V2 EAP225_V3
EAP225-Outdoor_V1
EAP110-Outdoor_V1 EAP110-Outdoor_V3
EAP245_V1 EAP245_V3
EAP115-Wall_V1 (  EAP115-Wall is suitable for EU verison Only.)
EAP225-Wall_V2
EAP235-Wall_V1
EAP230-Wall_V1
EAP320_V1 EAP320_V2
EAP330_V1 EAP330_V2

 

New Feature/Enhancement:
1. Change the mechanism that when adopting an EAP, the Controller will retain the IP configuration of EAP in Standalone mode. 
2. Extend the Max Associated Clients in Load Balance to 255.
3. Optimize the UI of Channel Utilization.
4. Optimize the authentication page of portal.
5. Optimize the UI of the portal that you cannot click Apply when you are uploading a photo.

Bug Fixed:
Fixed the bug that the page of MAC filter may not display all groups when there are more than 5 groups. 

Notes:
1. For OC200 (UN) v1.0 only.
2. To use new features of OC200, you need to upgrade your EAP's firmware to the corresponding version.
3. Your device's configuration won't be lost after upgrading.

༺ 0100 1101 0010 10ཏ1 0010 0110 1010 1110 ༻
  1  
  1  
#16
Options
Re:TX Frames - High, likely a problem?
2020-01-06 15:54:57 - last edited 2020-01-06 15:56:11

@Fugazi 

 

Please note that the new controller software is a release for the OC200 controller, and not for the Linux/Windows software.  I doesn't look like TP-Link released version 2.3.5 of the standalone Omada software yet.  Do you actaully have an OC200 controller?

 

Also, @R1D2 is it an issue to use the EU firmware on a US OC200?  They do have a new release on the US OC200 page as well.

 

 

Edit: Sorry hashrack, this was meant for Fugazi...

  0  
  0  
#17
Options
Re:TX Frames - High, likely a problem?
2020-01-06 16:06:21

@Questionmark 

Yeah thanks for that, just knew right after I've downloaded the given link it was actually a .bin file so it is only for oc200, btw I'm only using omada controller on a windows pc. I guess I have to wait for the official release for windows version.

  0  
  0  
#18
Options
Re:TX Frames - High, likely a problem?
2020-01-06 16:09:19

Hi @Questionmark,

 

Omada Controller is UN (universal) software. Yes, it's the OC200 version, AFAIK the software controller V2.3.5 has not been released so far.

༺ 0100 1101 0010 10ཏ1 0010 0110 1010 1110 ༻
  0  
  0  
#19
Options
Re:TX Frames - High, likely a problem?
2020-01-06 18:06:36

Hi @TheKaban,

 

happy new year, too. The Auranet CAP series has basic/supported rate settings, so I'm not sure whether we will see this in Omada EAP series.

 

༺ 0100 1101 0010 10ཏ1 0010 0110 1010 1110 ༻
  0  
  0  
#20
Options
Re:TX Frames - High, likely a problem?
2020-01-06 18:22:04

@ R1D2, what do you think about this feature?  
 

I hope that this feature will appear in the omada series!)

 

Maybe the guys from TP-LINK will be able to comment on this for us.

 

Thank You!)

  0  
  0  
#21
Options
Re:TX Frames - High, likely a problem?
2020-01-06 22:27:05

@TheKaban,

 

you asked for my opinion: if a customer (of my company!) needs such features offered by Auranet CAPs only, I would recommend him to buy CAPs, else I would recommend Omada EAPs. We offer installation services for both types of APs.

 

I think that TP-Link divisions won't compete with themself – the more expensive Auranet CAPs always have offered more features than EAPs, which once have been forked off from the Auranet series to form the new, cheaper Omada series. Seems to me like product policy. But that's just my opinion.

༺ 0100 1101 0010 10ཏ1 0010 0110 1010 1110 ༻
  0  
  0  
#22
Options