Short range link optimisation with CPE210
This thread has been locked for further replies. You can start a new thread to share your ideas or ask questions.
Short range link optimisation with CPE210
Model :
Hardware Version :
Firmware Version :
ISP :
Hi, I have set up a point to point link using two CPE210's. They are mounted at level heights and aligned optimally. The requirement is for no greater speed than an 802.11g would provide.
I have set them up with 'standard' settings except for having scanned the area for the best channel and selected it manually. the settings are:
Ch - 3
Ch Width 20/40
B/G/N mixed
max tx 60mbs
max tx power 0dbm
this gives me a wireless sig quality of:
-46dBm sig
-103dBm noise
57dB snr
100 CCQ
Physical separation ~ 10 maybe 15meters (yes i know, i suggested a cable too)
Through experimentation i reduced the tx power (on both sides of the link obviously) down to zero as it was almost unusable on the default setting, the lower i set it the better CCQ value i was getting. Now set to zero i cant go any lower & i feel its still too high possible as the link is still unstable - in that i can't get a consistant throughput through the link.
Can anyone suggest a more optimal config? or am i just using them too close together & that's it?
Regards,
Carl
Hardware Version :
Firmware Version :
ISP :
Hi, I have set up a point to point link using two CPE210's. They are mounted at level heights and aligned optimally. The requirement is for no greater speed than an 802.11g would provide.
I have set them up with 'standard' settings except for having scanned the area for the best channel and selected it manually. the settings are:
Ch - 3
Ch Width 20/40
B/G/N mixed
max tx 60mbs
max tx power 0dbm
this gives me a wireless sig quality of:
-46dBm sig
-103dBm noise
57dB snr
100 CCQ
Physical separation ~ 10 maybe 15meters (yes i know, i suggested a cable too)
Through experimentation i reduced the tx power (on both sides of the link obviously) down to zero as it was almost unusable on the default setting, the lower i set it the better CCQ value i was getting. Now set to zero i cant go any lower & i feel its still too high possible as the link is still unstable - in that i can't get a consistant throughput through the link.
Can anyone suggest a more optimal config? or am i just using them too close together & that's it?
Regards,
Carl